It is a truth universally acknowledged that, from the
perspective of urban sociologists and planners, at least, major discount
retailers such as Walmart have thrived on the destruction of commercial
activity in traditional town centers.
No doubt my assertion borders on exaggeration, but it would have to,
considering I’ve cribbed Jane Austen’s famous (and equally ironically hyperbolic)
first seven words to Pride and Prejudice,
in which a man’s search of a wife sets a blithe tone for much of what
follows. By contrast, the
unceasing diatribes against Walmart from urban advocates are rarely
whimsical. And while not every
high-profile writer/blogger on urban affairs excoriates Walmart, the general
tenor of the discussion ascribes much of the decline of downtown retail to the
much-maligned megachain. After
all, virtually every freestanding small city in America over 20,000 people that
is not part of a larger metropolitan agglomeration can claim a Walmart, perched
at the edge of the municipal limits.
And yes, the burgeoning of Walmarts does more or less coincide with the
near abandonment of historic, pedestrian-scaled main streets in favor of car-oriented
commercialization consolidated into big-box department stores.
But did a corporation—or the
corporation—really cause all this?
If the average American consumers genuinely cared enough
about Main Street or the courthouse square, wouldn’t they have shunned this
commercial cataclysm before it radically altered the entire landscape? Wasn’t it the consumer that ultimately
fueled Walmart’s meteoric growth, by opting for the convenience of everything
under one roof, abundant free parking, and (perhaps the most objective factor)
those famously low prices? Some
might argue that I’m unreasonably throwing Walmart a bone, since the folks at
the boardroom table clearly knew what would happen to Main Street, as
department-store big-box shopping encroached on communities that commercial
developers had previously perceived as too modest in size to support this
retail typology. And, yes, I
recognize the firm’s historic opposition toward unionization, its eventual
reneging on a long-standing “Made in America” pledge, and even the management
of logistics/merchandising favoring the automatization of functions that once
provided communities with stable jobs.
Maybe I am cutting Walmart some undeserved slack. But I also think the corporation’s
biggest critics fail to recognize that Walmart didn’t become a leviathan
overnight, any more than these towns devolved from flourishing to failures with
the flick of a light switch.
My own articles on main street America have explored the
topic routinely. But it took a
visit to Bentonville, Arkansas to develop a more nuanced understanding of Walmart’s
approach to community engagement right at the belly of the beast.
My suspicion is that, until probably around the year 2001,
98% of Americans hadn’t heard of this well-scrubbed little municipality in the northwest
corner of the state, just a stone’s throw from the rugged topography of the
Ozarks. Even today, if people are
familiar with the town, it is only because it hosts the corporate headquarters
for the world’s largest retailer.
And there’s nothing wrong with this seemingly simplified association:
after all, one would be hard-pressed to find anyone in Bentonville who would
argue that the city is better known for something else. But what sort of impact has Walmart’s
presence exerted on what otherwise would likely be a nondescript, mid-southern
county seat?
Not surprisingly, the influence has been formidable. I mention the year 2001 because, upon
publishing the results of Census 2000, the nation learned that the Northwest
Arkansas Metropolitan Statistical Area (consisting of the primary cities of
Fayetteville, Springdale, Rogers and Bentonville) had become the sixth-fastest
growing region in the nation. While a Census update isn’t the
sort of news item that necessarily grabs the public by its lapels, it can flirt
salaciously with the unconscious and, eventually, through mimetic repetition, penetrate
to the conscious. With each
passing year, Bentonville has grabbed the headlines more often, as decisions
from the Wal-mart Stores, Inc. Home Office exert a greater impact on the global
economy. I would hesitate to assert
that the name “Bentonville, Arkansas” is common knowledge to the same level
that a similarly-sized city such as “Beverly Hills, California” might be, partly
because the similarities between these two places basically stop there. But its star is rising on both the
national and international horizon, since many of Walmart’s foreign retail
ventures have proven just as successful as their domestic efforts. And Bentonville, predictably, has
enjoyed its share of the region’s growth: at over 35,000 people in 2010, it
more tripled its population since the 1990 census, and, as recently as 1960, it
was a quiet village of barely 3,500 people.
The impact on this growth is obvious, particularly when
viewing the street configuration.
The shift from a conventional grid to a more hierarchical
arrangement is conspicuous and unsurprising. The oldest part of the city adopted the grid, which was
customary for shaping virtually all communities in the 19th and
early 20th century. Yet
80% of Bentonville’s city limits (which extend in all directions beyond the
boundaries in the image above) fits the more expansive, automobile-oriented
configuration, in which streets curve and wend, sometimes into hairpins, sometimes
into full loops. Often they terminate
as culs-de-sac. For a municipality
that remained a modest village until the 1950s, this growth pattern is normal
and broadly characteristic of numerous Sunbelt communities. Thus, the city of Bentonville has
decentralized considerably in the last fifty years, in addition to hosting the
global headquarters to the retail behemoth most regularly flagged as the
culprit in expediting the demise of downtowns. Given these two factors, one prevailing question remains:
what on earth does its beleaguered town center look like?
Chances are, you’d be as surprised as I was.
It looks terrific.
Nearly 100% occupancy, clean sidewalks, a well-manicured streetscape. And virtually of all the retail
mix—from bike shops to brasseries, yoga studios to yogurt cafes, tea rooms to
trattorias—caters to an upmarket clientele, suggesting that the leasing rates
are fairly high.
The culminating attraction, however, is the humble
storefront that spawned it all:
Sam Walton’s original five-and-dime now serves as the Walmart Visitors’ Center and a mini-museum,
with interactive exhibits and the recreation of a soda fountain.
These pictures date from a summer festival on the central
square, taken a few years ago, in 2010.
Though they are obviously a bit faded by now—not all of the visitor
attractions were open yet during my visit—I can say with a fair amount of
confidence that downtown Bentonville is even stronger today. After all, most estimates show the city
has continued to grow another 10% since the 2010 Census results, and,
considering that it was demonstrating considerable resilience during the peak
of the Great Recession, the downtown is likely only to build on a momentum it
had established long before the bubble burst. A detractor might challenge my assertion by arguing that I
captured the city during an atypically vibrant time, when out-of-towners had
flocked to the city for the summer celebration on the courthouse square. But how could the downtown support a
high concentration of restaurants, cafés and boutiques if it weren’t lively
during the other times of the week as well?
The fact remains that downtown Bentonville boasts a number
of civic associations that have worked tirelessly to boost its cachet, including
Downtown Bentonville, Inc, a nonprofit association that promotes, attracts investment, and plans
activities for Bentonville’s historic downtown, as well as the Bentonville Merchant District,
which seeks to attract upscale traveling merchants through the provision of
Class A office space and furnished loft-style apartments close to the city
center. The city also has a
Convention and Visitors Bureau and a Chamber of Commerce. These organizations have no
doubt worked tirelessly to re-centralize investment in Bentonville’s small
downtown, even as the vast majority of the population growth over the last two
decades has taken place in the purlieus.
By most metrics, their efforts have paid off. But plenty of other similarly sized cities can claim the
same business associations without these results; I blogged about Jefferson City, Missouri earlier this year, a small city whose civic leaders have collaborated to promote the
downtown. However, the results in
Jefferson City, while palpable, have been much more modest than Bentonville—and
it is nothing less than the state capital.
Bentonville is simply part of a region that is enjoying a
persistent economic boom. The
other primary cities in this unusual metropolitan area—Rogers, Springdale and
Fayetteville—are also growing like mad.
It doesn’t hurt that the region is home to two other nationally prominent
companies: Springdale’s Tyson Foods, the world’s largest meat producer, and
trucking giant J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., based in the town of Lowell,
which abuts Rogers. But the real
cog in the wheel remains the world’s largest retailer, headquartered in
Bentonville, and I still suspect the corporation and its numerous investments
has more to do with downtown’s vibrancy than the tourist bureau. Walmart undoubtedly prefers to
associate its name with a municipality that enjoys a profile of prosperity and
high quality of life; the company will do what it takes to maintain that image
within Bentonville.
So what is the visual evidence that this isn’t just a
run-of-the-mill boomtown? Beyond
from the picture-perfect courthouse square, the air of plentitude permeates
the city.
However, it isn’t just the park spaces that distinguish the
more recently developed outer reaches of Bentonville; all the spaces in between
have received above average treatment as well.
So a city street has sidewalks. Big deal, some might say. But it is out of character for low density, hierarchical,
auto-oriented development in the South to make any concession for pedestrians,
let alone a full network of sidewalks along all of the major streets. Compare Bentonville to just about any
other city in Arkansas (outside of the Northwest) and you’d be hard pressed to
find sidewalks on any arterial or collector roads beyond the historic original
street grid. Both the Department
of Parks and Recreation and the Department of Planning in Bentonville have
determined that core pedestrian access remains critical, even when the
development pattern is sparse, in keeping with the preferences of the majority
of people who settle in this part of the country. The former of the two aforementioned departments
reveals that it has conceived network of parks, greenways and biking trails
rivals that of a community three times its size.
Meanwhile, the latter-mentioned planning department has
several aces up its sleeve as well.
While it isn’t unheard of that a city might support a 76-page Bicycleand Pedestrian Master Plan, a Smart Growth Guidebook, or a Traffic Calming Guidebook, it certainly places the city well outside the bell curve when juxtaposed with
its peers. After all, even the
neighboring city of Rogers (pop. 55,000) shows no evidence that its planning
department has the resources even to conceive of such initiatives.
The aforementioned features are hardly likely to elevate
anyone’s pulse; they aren’t exactly competing with Manhattan’s High Line for infrastructural
innovation. And it’s unreasonable
to surmise that Walmart had any real influence on what remain purely publicly
owned assets. But one structure in
Bentonville is likely to turn the head of even the most skeptical coastal snob:
the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art.
The structure was not complete when I visited Bentonville in
2010, but it opened to the public in late 2011, and made international
headlines for both its novelty (first major American art museum to open in 50
years, and the only one in an over 100-mile radius) as well as its magnitude
(over 200,000 square feet of space on 120-acre grounds and a collection valued in
the hundreds of millions). The
striking edifice reaches Bentonville courtesy of internationally recognized Israeli-Canadian
architect Moshe Safdie. Perhaps
most importantly though, it is resolutely the vision of Alice Walton, daughter
to founder Sam Walton and heiress to his fortune. In one of many interviews she offered at
the time of the museum’s opening, Walton, who has been an art collector most of
her life, acknowledged that she wanted to make a difference in this part of the
world by bringing “something we desperately need”. She contributed over $300 million to the project, built on
family land. Admission to the
museum is free, but because of its destination status, visitors will typically
linger, travel the grounds, shop, buy a meal. A Huffington Post article
from the museum’s infancy concluded
that the museum would skyrocket past its estimated 250,000 first-year visitors,
based on the success after just three months open to the public.
If Crystal Bridges Museum lives up to its promise as an
attraction of national or even international caliber, Bentonville clearly needs
the tourist infrastructure to support those visitors. But it would appear it already has it. Just down the road, in neighboring
Rogers, an Embassy Suites Spa and Convention Center flanks one side of the
interstate; the Pinnacle Hills lifestyle center sits on the other. And, earlier this year, the sleek 21c Museum Hotel, famous for the prominent positioning of contemporary art, opened
right off of Bentonville’s courthouse square - only the third of its kind in the country. (Louisville and Cincinnati claim the other two.) Many of the amenities that have
sprouted across Northwest Arkansas over the last twenty years are in keeping
with a metropolitan area of nearly a half million people; of course it has a
mall, convention center, and a seasonal symphony orchestra. But while growth trajectory of the
metro might resemble that of Phoenix or Las Vegas, no single municipality has
spawned everything here in Arkansas.
As of 1950, only college town Fayetteville had even 10,000 people. The other towns—Lowell, Rogers, Bella
Vista, Johnson, Springdale, and of course Bentonville—were isolated villages
that boomed simultaneously, swelling their incorporated boundaries until they
touched one another. As a result,
Northwest Arkansas may be the country’s youngest conurbation: a 35-mile string
of small cities—a microlopolis.
(The only comparable phenomenon I can think of domestically would be the
Texas border towns along the Rio Grande, but even Brownsville and McAllen were
more than villages fifty years ago, and they’re big cities over 100,000 people
now.)
The rapid ascension of these communities into a regional
economic powerhouse—with the amenities one might from a single, medium-sized
city—may very well neatly manifest the multiplier effect. But it still doesn’t explain how
Bentonville, the epicenter of Walmartlandia, has managed to hold its own with a
lively downtown, when plenty of other fast-growing big cities struggle to keep
it all centralized (Houston, for example). After all, in one of the most famous journalistic
explorations of Northwest Arkansas, Financial Times’ “The Town that Wal-Mart Built”, Jonathan Birchall observed in 2009 that he always found it “hard not to be hit
by the irony in this Bentonville Renaissance. Wal-Mart’s football-stadium-sized
supercentres are, after all, the epitome of the chain store culture that has
destroyed small town centres and homogenised communities all over America in
the past three decades.” But it
sounds like he took the bait.
The town that Walmart built has either proven itself immune
to the main-street-murdering forces that afflicted most American cities, or it
has recovered from that ailment magnificently. Bentonville also boasts a regional airport that offers
year-round, nonstop daily service to New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago; Alice
Walton’s money helped build the terminal, which serves a population that had no
regular airfare until 1998.
Bentonville Public Schools have offered the prestigious International
Baccalaureate program since 2007.
And yes, Bentonville has a Walmart not so far away, in what probably was
the edge of town not too long ago.
By this point in such a lengthy analysis, it’s obvious what
has happened: Bentonville has responded to the fact that it hosts a
multinational corporation by offering the sort of amenities needed to attract
talent to the region—talent that, its current leadership presumes, will propel
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. to another fifty years of unprecedented growth.
Most MBA grads trained at Harvard, Wharton or Kellogg are
going to need enticement to move to an area not recognized for its urban
offerings. On top of all the talent
in multinational retail, Bentonville and its neighbors most also graciously
host the satellite offices of 1,300 suppliers whom Walmart has lured due to its vast trade network—ranging in size from one
sales exec to something as large as Procter and Gamble, for whom a few hundred
employees call Northwest Arkansas home.
The elite business class that routinely visits the Walmart headquarters
expects top-tier hotels and shopping, while many of the executives who make it
their permanent home will inevitably seek sophisticated eateries in an
attractive, walkable setting. How
much of all this was funded directly by Walmart is anyone’s guess (though I’m
sure at least someone out there has the numbers). The fact remains that the corporate culture in Bentonville
fueled a demand for a Parks Department that builds a network out of its green
space, or a Planning Department that performs traffic calming studies.
The hardened cynics can read about this serendipity in the
Ozarks and offer an acerbic rebuttal: of
course Walmart is going to prop up its hometown, but does that absolve it
from the devastation that has taken place virtually everywhere else? This assertion would be valid if every
town with a Walmart suffered an equally moribund Main Street. But they clearly haven’t. And there remain villages too small or
too remote for a Walmart, which have confronted the exact same decline of entrepreneurism
in their historic centers. Arguing
from that same angle, the City of Bentonville did not enjoin Walmart to
revitalize downtown—or force Alice Walton to build Crystal Bridges—any more
than existing laws compelled Cornelius Vanderbilt to endow a university in
Nashville, the capital of a state he never even visited. No doubt some of Walmart’s boosterism in Bentonville is
self-serving, since a desirable community only helps to improve Walmart’s
reputation as both an employer and corporate citizen, which in turn can attract
further investment. However,
viewing all corporate altruism as suspicious requires a labyrinthine
recontextualization that is just as distorted as saying “Walmart killed our
downtowns”. Or its equally
hyperbolic counterpart: “Walmart has had no impact on the way we shop on main
street”. Clearly it has, but the
forces compelling consumer behavior remain complicated—baffling even. For while most of us can understand
that we abandoned our old downtowns out of convenience and lack of foresight,
no one will ever truly be able to explain want prompted many American consumers
to give up their cars so they could return to bicycles. And if you don’t think I’m concluding
ironically, I’ve got a Jane Austen novel to sell you.
2 comments:
Watch out, Eric...challenging dominant thinking could get you labeled a heretic!
In all seriousness, I still stand by my theory that a downtown's prosperity hinges on when the rural at the edges of town developed. Or at least it's a factor. After all, every town in America was getting a K-Mart in its suburbs long before Wal-Mart dominated the scene, so Wal-Mart is not the single-handed culprit in the theory of the big box draining the downtown.
It sounds like the outskirts of Bentonville didn't start growing until the 1980s or early 1990s. And I think that plays a big role. Contrast that to towns who saw a housing and commercial boom around them starting in the 1950s or 1960s. By the time the 1970s rolled around, minorities were growing in the cities and the white population was resentful of those racial changes. The late 60s and 1970s were when the real changes to small downtowns took place. It was simultaneous with what happened to the big cities, but on a smaller scale. But the sociology behind it all is common. The social unrest of the time - minority riots and an increase in crime - created a fear of investment in small downtowns. If minorities moved in during the 1970s, they're still probably there today. That same fear still persists (irregardless of its legitimacy) in the minds of businesses and retail patrons. The failure of a town is rooted in what happened during the days of massive social unrest 40 years ago.
Once the 1990s rolled around, our society starting looking favorably at downtowns again. So when a town's outskirts started growing for the first time, attracting people from outside the area, those folks weren't afraid to invest in (and promote) the downtown because they didn't carry the baggage that the longtime residents harbored during the 1960s and 1970s. The societal attitudes that accompanied the time period when growth occurred have as much lasting effects - maybe more - as the growth itself. Perhaps planners would be wise to look at the sociology and psychology behind the economics, rather than the economics or even the physical development... which I think you subtly suggest.
Thanks for your comments, Matt--chances are I should have been burned on the stake a long time ago!
You might be onto something regarding Bentonville and the sociology of white flight. Truth is, Bentonville has been growing at a good clip since the 1940s, so as to whether or not the "outskirts" of Bentonville didn't take off until the 1980s would probably depend on the definition of outskirts. And you are probably dead-on in the implication that little of Bentonville's growth until the 1980s was from outside the area; up to that point, it was mostly in-state migration.
It's a much bigger challenge to gauge the influence of racial tension on decentralization trends, however, in a city like Bentonville, because it never really had another race to propel the white flight. Even today, Bentonville is less than 3% African American; as is typical of most of the Ozarks, it was probably nearly 100% white until the 1980s. These days, Asians and Hispanics comprise a much greater portion of the minority population, so if decentralization were ever to take place, now would be the more likely time--and it may very well be, since Bentonville and NW Arkansas didn't experience the social upheaval that characterizes much of the south. Massive white out-migration (in both the large cities and small towns) typically coincided with the desegregation of schools. To this day, most incorporated municipalities in Louisiana and Missouri (and southeast Arkansas) are majority black, and the whites live in the unincorporated areas. Whether or not it is to Bentonville's benefit that it did not experience this is anyone's guess, at least in terms of estimating a future for settlement patterns and racial harmony in what--at least for now--seems like a very prosperous city.
Post a Comment